rge numbers of T cells and facilitates microscopy data collection and 
analysis. Cultured T cells of the Jurkat line that are used in the present study have been previously shown to exhibit the same polarization response to this type of biomimetic surface as the primary T-killer cells to their immunologically cognate targets. Experimental observations are further compared in the present work with computational predictions. We have previously been able to explain the polarized location of the centrosome in conjugated T cells as arising from whole-cell structural optimization. The optimality was postulated to be multiobjective, as expressed in the several terms in the empirical energy function that is minimized: The model cell minimizes microtubule bending and cell surface area, while maximizing the area of contact with the target and maintaining the cell volume. This approach is 22761436 an extension of the energy-minimization method originally used by Holy et al. to explain experiments on microtubule asters in flat, T-Cell Polarity rigid chambers. Here we employ our modeling approach to explain our new experimental findings. Methods Experimental procedures Jurkat cells were grown and prepared for observation essentially as described before. Taxol and nocodazole were dissolved respectively in DMSO and ethanol as described in manufacturer’s manual and added to the cells suspended in RPMI 1640 growth medium at 1 mM and 100 nM respectively. Following the MedChemExpress ARN-509 addition of the drugs the cell suspensions were preincubated for 30 min at 37uC and under 5% CO2. Control cells were treated identically except that pure solvent was added instead of the drug solutions. After the preincubation, the suspensions were transferred to polyL-lysine-coated glass coverslips, which had been additionally coated with anti-TCR antibodies as described. Each experiment was done in a controlled triplicate. After 40 min of incubation on the coverslips, the cells were fixed for 30 min at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton for 5 min, and blocked with 10% goat serum. Immunostaining was done with anti-a-tubulin mouse antibody and goat antimouse TRITC-conjugated antibody. The coverslips were mounted using ProLong mounting medium. The samples were observed on a Nikon TE 200 inverted microscope. A planapochromatic 1006 oil-immersion objective with numerical aperture 1.4 was actuated by a PIFOC 721 piezo-positioner. Images were acquired using a CARV II spinningdisk confocal attachment and an ORCA II ERG camera. All hardware was controlled by IPLab software, which 23388095 was also used for image manipulation. Three-dimensional images were acquired at a formal resolution of 0.129, 0.129, and 0.4 mm in the X, Y, and Z dimensions. The cells were scored and classified for the centrosome polarity and centrality by examining the three-dimensional confocal images. The position of the centrosome was determined as the point of convergence of the fluorescent microtubules, usually corresponding to the point of maximum brightness. The cells were considered polarized if they displayed the microtubule aster converging within the bottom 2 mm of the cell, i.e. within 2 mm form the stimulatory substrate. Otherwise they were considered as non-polarized”. The polarized cells were further classified according to whether the centrosome was within 2 mm of the margin of the area of the cell contact with the substrate or anywhere farther away from the margin. All cells in 30 full-frame,
