L with taught lines and with an escalating slope, which MATLAB
L with taught lines and with an increasing slope, which MATLAB or the higher the score Evaluation. The students mustbetter the 5 final reports, 1 perresults, which correspond to a within the assignments, the make final exam score. These assignment, which can be evaluated taking into consideration not that haveresults along with a correct resolution, but also the high quality from the as group of students only the traditionally shown a high engagement with the module, reports (great good quality figures and good writing). theis interesting to observe the students are nicely as with the assignments proposed throughout It term, suggest that when how on the web teaching did not influence a higher the final exam or the assignments scores within the case of theand motivated, there is either correlation among the score obtained within the assignments firstthe score obtained in the final exam. The assignments within the second group. constantly been group, whilst both scores were considerably decreased of those students have Figure four compares the correlation among in Figure 4a. of a basic higher high-quality, as may be observedassignments’ typical scores and also the final exam score the case from the second group (Figure 4b), although allwith linear trend lines, In of all of the students via the final 5 academic years trend lines have constructive slopes, as inside the case with the first group, points are scattered the last two years, affected which intend to assist in understanding the variations betweenaround the trend lines and less concentrated pandemic, as well as the previous 3. by the COVID-19 about them. These final results recommend that the correlation between the scores obtained in the assignments and in the final exam is just not clear. As shown within the figure, some students obtained a higher score within the final exam despite the fact that their overall performance in theSustainability 2021, 13,12 ofSustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEWassignments was mediocre, whilst some other people obtained terrible outcomes in the final exam right after performing effectively within the assignments.12 of(a)(b)Figure 4. four. Correlation ofassignment average score and final exam score through the final 5 academic and final exam score via the final 5 acaFigure Correlation of assignment average demic years in SB 271046 Autophagy modules taught at Universidad de Ja (UJA):(UJA): (a) GYY4137 custom synthesis Theory of structures 3rdthe years in each each modules taught at Universidad de Ja (a) Theory of structures on the of year 3rd year of Eng.; (b) TheoryTheory of structures2nd year of year of Civil Eng. of Mech. Mech. Eng.; (b) of structures on the in the 2nd Civil Eng.InThese results confirm that students’ engagement is extremely similar in all fivefinal outcomes. the case on the initial group (Figure 4a), the trend can be a important aspect for superior academic years. Inthe students are year, points tendteaching and flipped linear trendeffective along with the When each and every academic engaged, on the internet to collect about the studying is lines, depicted with dashed lines and with an escalating slope, which suggests that the higher the score every day work, evidenced by the assignment scores, is of excellent top quality. Nonetheless, when inthe group is not motivated,the final exam score. These results, which correspond to a the assignments, the much better their low engagement tends to make flipped understanding ineffective, group ofexplains why the assignments do shown a higher engagementbuilding of understanding which students which have traditionally not reflect clearly the true using the module, also the with the assignments proposed through the term, recommend that when the students of as students.
